Why are spellcheckers insufficient for proofreading academic papers?

Spellcheckers are insufficient for proofreading academic papers because they often miss contextual errors and nuances that a human proofreader would catch. While spellcheckers are helpful in identifying basic spelling mistakes and some grammatical issues, they are not foolproof. They may not recognize words used incorrectly in context, such as homophones or jargon that may be incorrect in the specific academic field. Therefore, students cannot rely solely on spellcheckers to ensure the accuracy and clarity of their writing. Human proofreaders bring a level of comprehension, insight, and understanding of stylistic and contextual elements that automated tools lack. This reliance on automated tools alone may lead to oversights that compromise the quality of academic writing.