Which is NOT one of the steps to evaluate an author's argument?

To evaluate an author's argument effectively, one must engage with specific steps that critically assess the content and structure of the argument presented. Identifying the author's assumptions is essential because it allows the reader to understand the underlying beliefs and premises that support the argument. Evaluating whether the argument is complete helps to determine if the author has addressed all necessary points or counterarguments, which is crucial for the argument's strength. Deciding whether the evidence is relevant allows readers to ascertain whether the supporting information directly contributes to the claims made by the author.

While assessing the author's credentials can provide insight into their authority or expertise on a subject, this step is not fundamental in the core evaluation of the argument itself. The validity and effectiveness of an argument should stand on its own merit, based on logic, evidence, and rhetorical strategies, rather than solely on the author's background. Hence, the process of evaluating an author's argument does not typically include this step as a standard practice.