Which fallacy uses a claim's repetition to persuade listeners?

The identified fallacy involves using repetition of a claim to influence persuasion. This is referred to as "argumentum ad nausea," which emphasizes that repeatedly stating a claim can convince or persuade an audience, regardless of its truthfulness. The idea is that through incessant repetition, an assertion can be ingrained in the minds of listeners, who may come to accept it as true simply because they have heard it multiple times.

In contrast, the other options focus on different argumentative flaws. For instance, argumentum ad verecundiam pertains to appealing to authority rather than the merit of the argument itself, while argumentum ad logicam refers to a fallacy that dismisses an argument based on a failure in logic rather than engaging with the content. The straw man fallacy involves misrepresenting someone's argument to refute it more easily. Hence, the uniqueness of argumentum ad nausea lies in its reliance on repetition for persuasion, making it the correct choice in this context.